Government of Gujarat vs SARIFABEN WO AADAMBHAI DAL Advocate - A R BAMBHAVA — 593/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ100007362025
e-Filing Number
02-12-2025
Filing Number
593/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
593/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213042250659
Police Station
PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARIFABEN WO AADAMBHAI DAL Advocate - A R BAMBHAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused Sarifaben (charged under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A)) due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution alleged she was found with 10 bottles of country liquor on 17/11/2025, the court found that the complainants were primarily police witnesses, no independent witnesses were examined, and the chain of custody and possession were not conclusively established beyond reasonable doubt. The court granted the benefit of doubt and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 593/2025
Summary The court acquitted the accused Sarifaben (charged under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A)) due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution alleged she was found with 10 bottles of country liquor on 17/11/2025, the court found that the complainants were primarily police witnesses, no independent witnesses were examined, and the chain of custody and possession were not conclusively established beyond reasonable doubt. The court granted the benefit of doubt and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts