Government of Gujarat vs miraben mukeshbahi solanki Advocate - B K TRIVEDI — 589/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ100007322025
e-Filing Number
28-10-2025
Filing Number
589/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
589/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213042250560
Police Station
PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.miraben mukeshbahi solanki Advocate - B K TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 589-2025 The court acquitted the accused, Miraaben Mukeshbhai Solanki, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted critical evidentiary gaps: only police witnesses testified despite the offense occurring in a public place, no independent witnesses were examined, and insufficient evidence established the accused's conscious possession of the contraband liquor seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 589/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 589-2025 The court acquitted the accused, Miraaben Mukeshbhai Solanki, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted critical evidentiary gaps: only police witnesses testified despite the offense occurring in a public place, no independent witnesses were examined, and insufficient evidence established the accused's conscious possession of the contraband liquor seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts