Government of Gujarat vs alpeshbhai karashanbhai kamariya Advocate - A V GADARA — 553/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ100006912025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-10-2025

Filing Number

553/2025

Filing Date

17-11-2025

Registration No

553/2025

Registration Date

17-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

445

Police Station

PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

alpeshbhai karashanbhai kamariya Advocate - A V GADARA

pareshbhai girdharbhai javiya

Adv. A V GADARA

hardik kamleshbhai koringa

Adv. A V GADARA

naimish devakaranbhai rangapariya

Adv. A V GADARA

mahendrabhai pragajibhai kamariya

Adv. A V GADARA

prakash jasavatbhai mendapara

Adv. A V GADARA

yatin chandubhai kamariya

Adv. A V GADARA

pankaj bhimajibhai kalavadiya

Adv. A V GADARA

rintu karashanbhai kamariya

Adv. A V GADARA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC No.553-2025 The court acquitted all nine accused of gambling charges under Section 12 of the Gambling Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key weakness in the prosecution's case was that the panchnama (official memo of seizure) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses—the panch signatories could not substantiate the alleged recovery of Rs. 72,700 and gambling equipment, and the police witnesses admitted to procedural gaps including lack of station diary entries and no documentary evidence of the location. Consequently, the court gave the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered their acquittal while directing bail forfeiture under CrPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No.553-2025 The court acquitted all nine accused of gambling charges under Section 12 of the Gambling Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key weakness in the prosecution's case was that the panchnama (official memo of seizure) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses—the panch signatories could not substantiate the alleged recovery of Rs. 72,700 and gambling equipment, and the police witnesses admitted to procedural gaps including lack of station diary entries and no documentary evidence of the location. Consequently, the court gave the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered their acquittal while directing bail forfeiture under CrPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case