Government of Gujarat vs alpeshbhai karashanbhai kamariya Advocate - A V GADARA — 553/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ100006912025
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
553/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
553/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
445
Police Station
PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
alpeshbhai karashanbhai kamariya Advocate - A V GADARA
pareshbhai girdharbhai javiya
Adv. A V GADARA
hardik kamleshbhai koringa
Adv. A V GADARA
naimish devakaranbhai rangapariya
Adv. A V GADARA
mahendrabhai pragajibhai kamariya
Adv. A V GADARA
prakash jasavatbhai mendapara
Adv. A V GADARA
yatin chandubhai kamariya
Adv. A V GADARA
pankaj bhimajibhai kalavadiya
Adv. A V GADARA
rintu karashanbhai kamariya
Adv. A V GADARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No.553-2025 The court acquitted all nine accused of gambling charges under Section 12 of the Gambling Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key weakness in the prosecution's case was that the panchnama (official memo of seizure) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses—the panch signatories could not substantiate the alleged recovery of Rs. 72,700 and gambling equipment, and the police witnesses admitted to procedural gaps including lack of station diary entries and no documentary evidence of the location. Consequently, the court gave the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered their acquittal while directing bail forfeiture under CrPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No.553-2025 The court acquitted all nine accused of gambling charges under Section 12 of the Gambling Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key weakness in the prosecution's case was that the panchnama (official memo of seizure) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses—the panch signatories could not substantiate the alleged recovery of Rs. 72,700 and gambling equipment, and the police witnesses admitted to procedural gaps including lack of station diary entries and no documentary evidence of the location. Consequently, the court gave the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered their acquittal while directing bail forfeiture under CrPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts