KAUSHL DILIPBHAI MASRANI vs GHANSHYAMBHAI BHUPATBHAI BHATT Advocate - B P BUDDHDEV — 12/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJRJ100001682023

Filing Number

12/2023

Filing Date

15-Mar-2023

Registration No

12/2023

Registration Date

15-Mar-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAUSHL DILIPBHAI MASRANI

    Adv. S D VORA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHANSHYAMBHAI BHUPATBHAI BHATT Advocate - B P BUDDHDEV

  2. 2.HARSHIL PIYUSHBHAI SHAH

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 06-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 01-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 24-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 12-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 31-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 10-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 19-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 21-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 09-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 20-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 06-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 25-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 24-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 26-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 12-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 20-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 07-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 30-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 10-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 18-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 21-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 23-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 04-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 04-Sep-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Case Number: RCS No. 12/2023 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Rajkot, Gujarat Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking a decree for mandatory injunction and other relief. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and that the defendants' obstruction of the plaintiff's property could not be proven as alleged. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding the Balance of Convenience doctrine and held that the mandatory injunction was not warranted in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  42. 04-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 01-Aug-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 17-Jul-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 03-Jul-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 14-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 06-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 03-May-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 12-Apr-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 05-Apr-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 23-Mar-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 20-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 17-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 16-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 15-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case Number: RCS No. 12/2023 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Rajkot, Gujarat Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking a decree for mandatory injunction and other relief. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and that the defendants' obstruction of the plaintiff's property could not be proven as alleged. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding the Balance of Convenience doctrine and held that the mandatory injunction was not warranted in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case