Government of Gujarat vs LAVJIBHAI DHARASIBHAI SADMIYA Advocate - A R BAMBHAVA — 74/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ100000972026

e-Filing Number

19-11-2025

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213042250590

Police Station

PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAVJIBHAI DHARASIBHAI SADMIYA Advocate - A R BAMBHAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Lavjibhai Dharshbhai Sadamiya of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), for allegedly possessing illicit liquor without a permit on October 15, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the absence of independent witnesses and reliance solely on police testimony. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that criminal cases require proof beyond reasonable doubt and observed critical gaps in evidence: no independent witnesses were examined despite the seizure occurring in a public area, panchnama (seizure document) procedures were questionable, and police witnesses alone cannot substantiate charges without corroborating independent testimony. Applying established judicial principles, the court granted the defendant the benefit of doubt and acquitted him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Lavjibhai Dharshbhai Sadamiya of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), for allegedly possessing illicit liquor without a permit on October 15, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the absence of independent witnesses and reliance solely on police testimony. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that criminal cases require proof beyond reasonable doubt and observed critical gaps in evidence: no independent witnesses were examined despite the seizure occurring in a public area, panchnama (seizure document) procedures were questionable, and police witnesses alone cannot substantiate charges without corroborating independent testimony. Applying established judicial principles, the court granted the defendant the benefit of doubt and acquitted him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case