ISHWARLAL GORDHANDAS CHAUHAN(Legal Heir) vs SUMANLAL CHHAKUBHAI MAHETA — 3/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 08th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ100000742024
Filing Number
3/2024
Filing Date
16-Sep-2008
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
16-Sep-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ISHWARLAL GORDHANDAS CHAUHAN(Legal Heir)
Adv. D R VAROTARIYA1.
-
2.LABHUBEN ISHWARLAL CHAUHAN 1.
-
3.SUBHASHBHAI ISHWARLAL CHAUHAN 1.
-
4.PRAFULBHAI ISHWARLAL CHAUHAN 1.
-
5.KALPESHBHAI ISHWARLAL CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMANLAL CHHAKUBHAI MAHETA
-
2.RAMESHCHANDRA CHHAKUBHAI MAHETA(Legal Heir) 2.
-
3.BIPIN RAMESHCHANDR MAHETA
Adv. D M PATEL2.
-
4.SANJAY RAMESHCHANDR MAHETA
Adv. D M PATEL
-
5.MANHARLAL CHHAKUBHAI MAHETA(Legal Heir)
-
6.NAVINCHANDR CHHKUBHAI MAHETA(Legal Heir)
-
7.HEMALBHAI SHIRISHKUMAR DOSHI
-
8.SHARDAGAURI VASHANTRAY SHETH(Legal Heir)
-
9.RAJESHBHAI VASHANTBHAI SHETH
Adv. H M UDANI
-
10.PARESHBHAI VASHANTBHAI SHETH
-
11.SANJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI MAHETA TE RAMESHCHANDR CHHAKUBHAI MAHETA
-
12.AMIBEN KAMLESHBHAI MAHETA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the plaintiff's case (Dismissal for Default) due to the plaintiff's failure to appear for hearings on multiple scheduled dates and lack of diligence in pursuing the case. The court found that the plaintiff had not fulfilled their duty to present evidence or documents as required, and consequently ruled against the continuation of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jun-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-May-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2008
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2024
The court dismissed the plaintiff's case (Dismissal for Default) due to the plaintiff's failure to appear for hearings on multiple scheduled dates and lack of diligence in pursuing the case. The court found that the plaintiff had not fulfilled their duty to present evidence or documents as required, and consequently ruled against the continuation of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts