KANCHANBEN MEGHJIBHAI RAMOLIYA vs NIL — 6/2026

Case under Succession Act,indian 1925 Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJRJ090000782026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LODHIKA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Succession Act,indian 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANCHANBEN MEGHJIBHAI RAMOLIYA

    Adv. R N SABHAYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Lodhika, Rajkot granted Kanchanben Meghjibbhai Ramoliya's application for a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 and Civil Manual Para-254 regarding the immovable property of her deceased son, Shaileshbhai Meghjibbhai Ramoliya. The court found that all legal requirements were satisfied—the death was proven, the applicant's relation to the deceased was established, proper public notice was issued with no objections received, and the property's details were verified through registered documents. The court directed issuance of the heirship certificate upon payment of applicable court fees and stamp duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Lodhika, Rajkot granted Kanchanben Meghjibbhai Ramoliya's application for a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 and Civil Manual Para-254 regarding the immovable property of her deceased son, Shaileshbhai Meghjibbhai Ramoliya. The court found that all legal requirements were satisfied—the death was proven, the applicant's relation to the deceased was established, proper public notice was issued with no objections received, and the property's details were verified through registered documents. The court directed issuance of the heirship certificate upon payment of applicable court fees and stamp duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case