THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAYPALSINH JIVUBHA JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 531/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ080006712025

Case disposed

Filing Number

531/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

531/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250564

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JAYPALSINH JIVUBHA JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamkandorna acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural defects in the investigation, lack of corroborating witness testimony from the panchas (neutral witnesses), and insufficient evidence linking the seized contraband to the accused's possession for sale. Consequently, the court set aside the charges and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamkandorna acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural defects in the investigation, lack of corroborating witness testimony from the panchas (neutral witnesses), and insufficient evidence linking the seized contraband to the accused's possession for sale. Consequently, the court set aside the charges and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case