THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAYPALSINH JIVUBHA JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 531/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ080006712025
Filing Number
531/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
531/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213020250564
Police Station
JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAYPALSINH JIVUBHA JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamkandorna acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural defects in the investigation, lack of corroborating witness testimony from the panchas (neutral witnesses), and insufficient evidence linking the seized contraband to the accused's possession for sale. Consequently, the court set aside the charges and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamkandorna acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural defects in the investigation, lack of corroborating witness testimony from the panchas (neutral witnesses), and insufficient evidence linking the seized contraband to the accused's possession for sale. Consequently, the court set aside the charges and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts