THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARSHADBA BALDEVSINH JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 528/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ080006682025
Filing Number
528/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
528/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213020250540
Police Station
JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HARSHADBA BALDEVSINH JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Harshendra Baldevsingh Jadeja on charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the investigation procedure was tainted and the prosecution failed to present credible evidence, particularly the panch witnesses did not support the case. The court held that without proper documentary evidence, FSL reports, and corroboration from independent witnesses, no conviction could be recorded, and ordered the accused's release with bail conditions per IPC Section 437 and CrPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Harshendra Baldevsingh Jadeja on charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the investigation procedure was tainted and the prosecution failed to present credible evidence, particularly the panch witnesses did not support the case. The court held that without proper documentary evidence, FSL reports, and corroboration from independent witnesses, no conviction could be recorded, and ordered the accused's release with bail conditions per IPC Section 437 and CrPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts