THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKSINH DEVUBHA JADEJA Advocate - R A SOJITRA — 527/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ080006672025
Filing Number
527/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
527/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213020250525
Police Station
JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHOKSINH DEVUBHA JADEJA Advocate - R A SOJITRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's version, the investigation procedure was tainted due to procedural irregularities, and critical evidence documentation was deficient, rendering conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's version, the investigation procedure was tainted due to procedural irregularities, and critical evidence documentation was deficient, rendering conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts