THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHARDABEN SHIVABHAI SADAMIYA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 523/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ080006632025
Filing Number
523/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
523/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213020250481
Police Station
JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHARDABEN SHIVABHAI SADAMIYA Advocate - P R KOYANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution's case was fundamentally flawed due to procedural irregularities in the investigation and lack of credible witness corroboration. The court held that panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the investigating officer failed to follow proper legal procedures, thereby tainting the entire investigation and rendering any conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution's case was fundamentally flawed due to procedural irregularities in the investigation and lack of credible witness corroboration. The court held that panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the investigating officer failed to follow proper legal procedures, thereby tainting the entire investigation and rendering any conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts