THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R A SOJITRA — 521/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ080006612025

Case disposed

Filing Number

521/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

521/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250471

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SURESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R A SOJITRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical defects in the investigation procedure, lack of independent witnesses' support, absence of required permits for holding seized alcohol, and insufficient corroborating evidence, rendering the entire investigation tainted and unreliable for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical defects in the investigation procedure, lack of independent witnesses' support, absence of required permits for holding seized alcohol, and insufficient corroborating evidence, rendering the entire investigation tainted and unreliable for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case