THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARAKRAMSINH VIKRAMSINH JADEJA Advocate - R A SOJITRA — 469/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ080005812025

Filing Number

469/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

469/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250437

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARAKRAMSINH VIKRAMSINH JADEJA Advocate - R A SOJITRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural defects: the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution, recovery of contraband lacked proper documentation, and independent witnesses were absent during the seizure. Consequently, the entire investigation procedure was deemed tainted, and no conviction could be legally sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 469/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural defects: the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution, recovery of contraband lacked proper documentation, and independent witnesses were absent during the seizure. Consequently, the entire investigation procedure was deemed tainted, and no conviction could be legally sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case