THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHETANBHAI GANGAJIBHAI VINJUDA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 17/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ080000512026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250522

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHETANBHAI GANGAJIBHAI VINJUDA Advocate - P R KOYANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the investigation procedure was tainted—the panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, proper seizure procedures were not followed, and critical evidentiary standards under the Indian Evidence Act were not met, rendering the conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the investigation procedure was tainted—the panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, proper seizure procedures were not followed, and critical evidentiary standards under the Indian Evidence Act were not met, rendering the conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case