THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHETANBHAI GANGAJIBHAI VINJUDA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 17/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ080000512026
Filing Number
17/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213020250522
Police Station
JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHETANBHAI GANGAJIBHAI VINJUDA Advocate - P R KOYANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 23-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the investigation procedure was tainted—the panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, proper seizure procedures were not followed, and critical evidentiary standards under the Indian Evidence Act were not met, rendering the conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the investigation procedure was tainted—the panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, proper seizure procedures were not followed, and critical evidentiary standards under the Indian Evidence Act were not met, rendering the conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts