THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAYABHAI NANJIBHAI MULIYA Advocate - R A SOJITRA — 10/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ080000442026

Case disposed

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250512

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DAYABHAI NANJIBHAI MULIYA Advocate - R A SOJITRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

PLEA

05-03-2026

PLEA

03-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Jamnagar First Class Magistrate's Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 11(1)(b) and 85(1) for committing first-time animal cruelty due to ignorance and lack of awareness. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 and 10 days simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's remorse, confession, family responsibilities, clean criminal record, and prospects for reformation under the principle established in State v. Natwar Harkhchand Thakore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Jamnagar First Class Magistrate's Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 11(1)(b) and 85(1) for committing first-time animal cruelty due to ignorance and lack of awareness. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 and 10 days simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's remorse, confession, family responsibilities, clean criminal record, and prospects for reformation under the principle established in State v. Natwar Harkhchand Thakore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case