PGVCL vs HERIS OF KARNUBHA JIJIBHA VALA GIRIRAJSINH KARNUBHA VALA Advocate - R K GAJERA — 41/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 35. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ070018782024
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
14-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, UPLETA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL
Adv. K R RANINGA
Respondent(s)
HERIS OF KARNUBHA JIJIBHA VALA GIRIRAJSINH KARNUBHA VALA Advocate - R K GAJERA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 20-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff electricity company's civil suit seeking recovery of Rs. 5,35,372-32 from the defendant for alleged electricity theft. The court held that under the Electricity Act 2003, civil liability for electricity theft can only be determined by the Special Court (established under Section 153) after criminal proceedings prove the theft, not through a separate civil suit. Since no Special Court order determining civil liability existed, the electricity company's remedy lay exclusively before the Special Court in the criminal case, not in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff electricity company's civil suit seeking recovery of Rs. 5,35,372-32 from the defendant for alleged electricity theft. The court held that under the Electricity Act 2003, civil liability for electricity theft can only be determined by the Special Court (established under Section 153) after criminal proceedings prove the theft, not through a separate civil suit. Since no Special Court order determining civil liability existed, the electricity company's remedy lay exclusively before the Special Court in the criminal case, not in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts