ROSHANBEN D/O GAFARBHAI LODHI vs YUSUFBHAI MUSABHAI KATARIYA Advocate - V S GAMBHIR — 239/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22,23. Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJRJ070016002024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
239/2024
Filing Date
30-08-2024
Registration No
239/2024
Registration Date
30-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, UPLETA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROSHANBEN D/O GAFARBHAI LODHI
Adv. M R CHAUHAN
FATEMA D/O YUSUFBHAI KATARIYA
Respondent(s)
YUSUFBHAI MUSABHAI KATARIYA Advocate - V S GAMBHIR
RAHIMABEN W/O MUSABHAI KATARIYA
Adv. V S GAMBHIR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CRMA/239/2024 Outcome: Petition for maintenance allowed. The court ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the wife (petitioner no. 1) and Rs. 2,000 to the child (petitioner no. 2), totaling Rs. 5,000 per month, until the final judgment in the main case is rendered. The order was issued based on the husband's alleged income from his meat business and daily wage labor, while considering the wife and child's destitute condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CRMA/239/2024 Outcome: Petition for maintenance allowed. The court ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the wife (petitioner no. 1) and Rs. 2,000 to the child (petitioner no. 2), totaling Rs. 5,000 per month, until the final judgment in the main case is rendered. The order was issued based on the husband's alleged income from his meat business and daily wage labor, while considering the wife and child's destitute condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts