FORAM D/O VIJAYBHAI KANERIYA W/O YASH AAKOLA vs YASH PRABHUDASHBHAI JAMNADASBHAI AAKOLA Advocate - M R CHAUHAN — 135/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJRJ070007802025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
135/2025
Filing Date
30-05-2025
Registration No
135/2025
Registration Date
30-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UPLETA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FIR Details
Police Station
BHAYAVADAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FORAM D/O VIJAYBHAI KANERIYA W/O YASH AAKOLA
Adv. D H JOSHI
Respondent(s)
YASH PRABHUDASHBHAI JAMNADASBHAI AAKOLA Advocate - M R CHAUHAN
PRABHUDASH JAMNADASH AAKOLA
Adv. M R CHAUHAN
BHAVNABEN PRABHUDASH AAKOLA
Adv. M R CHAUHAN
BHAKTIBEN PRABHUDASH AAKOLA
Adv. P G MEGHANI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. |
| 31-01-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: CRMA/135/2025 (Domestic Violence Act Application) Outcome: The petition for interim maintenance is partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband/family member) to pay the petitioner ₹4,000 per month for maintenance during the pendency of the domestic violence case, rather than the ₹25,000 originally requested. The court also issued a directive prohibiting the respondents from committing any form of physical or mental abuse, harassment, or electronic contact with the petitioner during the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: CRMA/135/2025 (Domestic Violence Act Application) Outcome: The petition for interim maintenance is partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband/family member) to pay the petitioner ₹4,000 per month for maintenance during the pendency of the domestic violence case, rather than the ₹25,000 originally requested. The court also issued a directive prohibiting the respondents from committing any form of physical or mental abuse, harassment, or electronic contact with the petitioner during the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts