FORAM D/O VIJAYBHAI KANERIYA W/O YASH AAKOLA vs YASH PRABHUDASHBHAI JAMNADASBHAI AAKOLA Advocate - M R CHAUHAN — 135/2025

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence Of Applicant. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Of Applicant Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJRJ070007802025

Filing Number

135/2025

Filing Date

30-May-2025

Registration No

135/2025

Registration Date

30-May-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UPLETA

Judge

2-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

BHAYAVADAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 17,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FORAM D/O VIJAYBHAI KANERIYA W/O YASH AAKOLA

    Adv. D H JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YASH PRABHUDASHBHAI JAMNADASBHAI AAKOLA Advocate - M R CHAUHAN

  2. 2.PRABHUDASH JAMNADASH AAKOLA

    Adv. M R CHAUHAN

  3. 3.BHAVNABEN PRABHUDASH AAKOLA

    Adv. M R CHAUHAN

  4. 4.BHAKTIBEN PRABHUDASH AAKOLA

    Adv. P G MEGHANI

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Case: CRMA/135/2025 (Domestic Violence Act Application) Outcome: The petition for interim maintenance is partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband/family member) to pay the petitioner ₹4,000 per month for maintenance during the pendency of the domestic violence case, rather than the ₹25,000 originally requested. The court also issued a directive prohibiting the respondents from committing any form of physical or mental abuse, harassment, or electronic contact with the petitioner during the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Interim Appli.

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Interim Appli.

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Interim Appli.

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 26-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 29-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 20-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 26-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 30-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: CRMA/135/2025 (Domestic Violence Act Application) Outcome: The petition for interim maintenance is partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband/family member) to pay the petitioner ₹4,000 per month for maintenance during the pendency of the domestic violence case, rather than the ₹25,000 originally requested. The court also issued a directive prohibiting the respondents from committing any form of physical or mental abuse, harassment, or electronic contact with the petitioner during the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case