Government of Gujarat vs JAYRAJSINH BALDEVSINH CHUDASHMA Advocate - M G SOLANKI — 7/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ070000132026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UPLETA
Judge
2-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213006250523
Police Station
BHAYAVADAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYRAJSINH BALDEVSINH CHUDASHMA Advocate - M G SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused guilty of illegal possession of alcohol under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment until court rises, or 2 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid. The court showed leniency by imposing a sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, confession, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2026
The court found the accused guilty of illegal possession of alcohol under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment until court rises, or 2 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid. The court showed leniency by imposing a sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, confession, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts