THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RASIKBHAI MOHANBHAI HARAYANI Advocate - H P MALVI — 388/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ060005132026

Case disposed

Filing Number

388/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

388/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213010260071

Police Station

DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RASIKBHAI MOHANBHAI HARAYANI Advocate - H P MALVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dhoraji convicted the accused, Rasikbhai Mohanbhai Hariyani, under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹200, with three days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid, considering mitigating factors including that it was his first offense and he is the sole earner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dhoraji convicted the accused, Rasikbhai Mohanbhai Hariyani, under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹200, with three days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid, considering mitigating factors including that it was his first offense and he is the sole earner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case