THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RASIKBHAI MOHANBHAI HARAYANI Advocate - H P MALVI — 388/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ060005132026
Filing Number
388/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
388/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213010260071
Police Station
DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RASIKBHAI MOHANBHAI HARAYANI Advocate - H P MALVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dhoraji convicted the accused, Rasikbhai Mohanbhai Hariyani, under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹200, with three days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid, considering mitigating factors including that it was his first offense and he is the sole earner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 388/2026
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dhoraji convicted the accused, Rasikbhai Mohanbhai Hariyani, under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹200, with three days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid, considering mitigating factors including that it was his first offense and he is the sole earner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts