THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAHESHBHAI HARUJIBHAI GELOT Advocate - H P MALVI — 386/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ060005102026

Filing Number

386/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

386/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213010260075

Police Station

DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.MAHESHBHAI HARUJIBHAI GELOT Advocate - H P MALVI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

The court found the accused, Maheshbhai Harujibhai Gelot, guilty of violating Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his first-time offense, family circumstances, and prospects for reformation, the court sentenced him to imprisonment until court rising and imposed a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 386/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Maheshbhai Harujibhai Gelot, guilty of violating Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his first-time offense, family circumstances, and prospects for reformation, the court sentenced him to imprisonment until court rising and imposed a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.