THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HASANBHAI ABABHAI FAKIR Advocate - H P MALVI — 382/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ060005062026

Filing Number

382/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

382/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213010250614

Police Station

DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASANBHAI ABABHAI FAKIR Advocate - H P MALVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhoraji convicted the accused, Hasnbhai Ababhaiukir, under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 285 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the accused's first-time offense, family responsibilities as the sole earning member, and rehabilitation potential, the court imposed the minimum sentence of a Rs. 200 fine, with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 382/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhoraji convicted the accused, Hasnbhai Ababhaiukir, under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 285 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the accused's first-time offense, family responsibilities as the sole earning member, and rehabilitation potential, the court imposed the minimum sentence of a Rs. 200 fine, with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case