THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ADANAN SALIMBHAI GARANA Advocate - H P MALVI — 381/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ060005052026

Filing Number

381/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

381/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213010260089

Police Station

DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADANAN SALIMBHAI GARANA Advocate - H P MALVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Dhoraji convicted the accused Adnan Salimbhai Garana under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter) based on his voluntary plea of guilty. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 200 and in default, simple imprisonment for three days, considering mitigating factors including this being the accused's first offense, his role as the sole earner of his family, and his commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 381/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Dhoraji convicted the accused Adnan Salimbhai Garana under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter) based on his voluntary plea of guilty. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 200 and in default, simple imprisonment for three days, considering mitigating factors including this being the accused's first offense, his role as the sole earner of his family, and his commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case