THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SIRAJBHAI MUSTAFABHAI SAIYAD Advocate - H P MALVI — 378/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ060005022026

Filing Number

378/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

378/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213010260092

Police Station

DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.SIRAJBHAI MUSTAFABHAI SAIYAD Advocate - H P MALVI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dhoraji convicted Sirajbhai Mustufabhai Saiyed under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering this was his first offense, his family dependence on him as the sole earner, and his promise of reform, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine, with three days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 378/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dhoraji convicted Sirajbhai Mustufabhai Saiyed under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering this was his first offense, his family dependence on him as the sole earner, and his promise of reform, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine, with three days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.