THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SIKANDARBHAI ISMILBHAI MANSURI Advocate - H P MALVI — 377/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ060005012026
Filing Number
377/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
377/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213010260088
Police Station
DHORAJI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIKANDARBHAI ISMILBHAI MANSURI Advocate - H P MALVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The court found the accused Sikandarabhai Ismaailabhai Mansuri guilty under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court considered mitigating factors including that it was his first offense, he is the sole breadwinner of his family, and his commitment to reform. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 or, in default, 3 days of simple imprisonment, applying the principle of minimum punishment while preserving justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 377/2026
Case Summary The court found the accused Sikandarabhai Ismaailabhai Mansuri guilty under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court considered mitigating factors including that it was his first offense, he is the sole breadwinner of his family, and his commitment to reform. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 or, in default, 3 days of simple imprisonment, applying the principle of minimum punishment while preserving justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts