Hitesh Laljibhai vs THE STATE AND KARYAPALAK EJNERSHRI, RAJKOT Advocate - AGP — 109/2009
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJRJ060002562009
Filing Number
109/2009
Filing Date
22-Jun-2007
Registration No
109/2009
Registration Date
14-Jul-2009
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hitesh Laljibhai
Adv. K D PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE AND KARYAPALAK EJNERSHRI, RAJKOT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Oct-2024
Restored
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Oct-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jun-2018
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Dhoraji rejected the land reference applications of three applicants seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court found that the applicants failed to provide any evidence to establish that the Collector's original compensation award was inadequate, and therefore upheld the Collector's award without any additional compensation or interference. The applicants were not entitled to enhanced compensation as they did not discharge their burden of proof to demonstrate the inadequacy of the original award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jun-2018
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Apr-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Apr-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Apr-2018
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jan-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jan-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Dec-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Oct-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Sep-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Aug-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jun-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jun-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Apr-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Mar-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Sep-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jun-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Oct-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Sep-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jul-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Mar-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2015
Summons - Notice
-
06-Jan-2015
Summons - Notice
-
28-Nov-2014
Summons - Notice
-
16-Oct-2014
Summons - Notice
-
06-Sep-2014
Summons - Notice
-
18-Mar-2013
Summons - Notice
-
11-Jan-2013
—
-
31-Oct-2012
—
-
18-Sep-2012
Summons - Notice
-
18-Jun-2012
Summons - Notice
-
24-Apr-2012
Summons - Notice
-
13-Mar-2012
Summons - Notice
-
14-Feb-2012
Summons - Notice
-
03-Dec-2011
Summons - Notice
-
18-Oct-2011
Summons - Notice
-
20-Aug-2011
Summons - Notice
-
11-Jul-2011
Summons - Notice
-
13-May-2011
Summons - Notice
-
26-Apr-2011
Summons - Notice
-
23-Mar-2011
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2007
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2009
Summary The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Dhoraji rejected the land reference applications of three applicants seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court found that the applicants failed to provide any evidence to establish that the Collector's original compensation award was inadequate, and therefore upheld the Collector's award without any additional compensation or interference. The applicants were not entitled to enhanced compensation as they did not discharge their burden of proof to demonstrate the inadequacy of the original award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts