GHELABHAI SAVJIBHAI vs THE STATE AND KARYAPALAK EJNERSHRI, RAJKOT Advocate - AGP — 82/2009
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJRJ060002292009
Filing Number
82/2009
Filing Date
11-Jun-2007
Registration No
82/2009
Registration Date
14-Jul-2009
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHELABHAI SAVJIBHAI
Adv. K D PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE AND KARYAPALAK EJNERSHRI, RAJKOT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Restored
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jul-2018
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court rejected the claimants' land acquisition reference cases, finding they failed to prove the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer was inadequate. The court held that claimants must establish through credible evidence that the original award is disproportionate before the burden shifts to the state to justify it, and since the claimants produced insufficient, uncorroborated testimony without proper documentation or comparable sale evidence, their appeals were dismissed without any enhancement of compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jul-2018
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Apr-2018
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jan-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jan-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Dec-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Oct-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Sep-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Aug-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jun-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jun-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Apr-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Sep-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jun-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Oct-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Sep-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jul-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Mar-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2015
Summons - Notice
-
06-Jan-2015
Summons - Notice
-
28-Nov-2014
Summons - Notice
-
16-Oct-2014
Summons - Notice
-
06-Sep-2014
Summons - Notice
-
19-Mar-2013
Summons - Notice
-
08-Jan-2013
Notice To Opponents
-
12-Nov-2012
—
-
04-Sep-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
20-Jun-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
07-May-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
26-Apr-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
20-Mar-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
27-Feb-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
16-Jan-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
05-Dec-2011
Summons - Notice
-
04-Nov-2011
Summons - Notice
-
12-Sep-2011
Summons - Notice
-
27-Jul-2011
Summons - Notice
-
20-Jun-2011
Summons - Notice
-
02-May-2011
Summons - Notice
-
15-Mar-2011
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2007
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2009
Summary The court rejected the claimants' land acquisition reference cases, finding they failed to prove the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer was inadequate. The court held that claimants must establish through credible evidence that the original award is disproportionate before the burden shifts to the state to justify it, and since the claimants produced insufficient, uncorroborated testimony without proper documentation or comparable sale evidence, their appeals were dismissed without any enhancement of compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts