Chandulal Narsibhai Ukani vs DEPUTY COLLECTOR SHRI AND KARYAPALAK EJNERSHRI, RAJKOT Advocate - AGP — 22/2009
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJRJ060001692009
Filing Number
22/2009
Filing Date
18-Jul-2007
Registration No
22/2009
Registration Date
14-Jul-2009
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandulal Narsibhai Ukani
Adv. K D PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEPUTY COLLECTOR SHRI AND KARYAPALAK EJNERSHRI, RAJKOT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Apr-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Mar-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Mar-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jan-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Dec-2024
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Dec-2024
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Nov-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Oct-2024
Restored
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jul-2018
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the claimants' reference case seeking enhanced land compensation. The court held that claimants failed to establish through credible evidence that the Land Acquisition Officer's award was inadequate, finding their oral testimony unsubstantiated by documentary proof, proper comparables, or supporting land sale deeds. Since claimants did not discharge their initial burden of proving inadequacy, the burden did not shift to the state to justify the award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jul-2018
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jun-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2018
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Apr-2018
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2018
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jan-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jan-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Dec-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Oct-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Sep-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Aug-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jul-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-May-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jun-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Apr-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Feb-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Jan-2016
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Sep-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Aug-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jun-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Apr-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2015
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2015
Summons - Notice
-
31-Dec-2014
Summons - Notice
-
25-Nov-2014
Summons - Notice
-
13-Oct-2014
Summons - Notice
-
06-Sep-2014
Summons - Notice
-
19-Mar-2013
Summons - Notice
-
08-Jan-2013
Notice To Opponents
-
12-Nov-2012
—
-
04-Sep-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
20-Jun-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
07-May-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
26-Apr-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
20-Mar-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
27-Feb-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
16-Jan-2012
Plaintiff Evidence
-
05-Dec-2011
Summons - Notice
-
04-Nov-2011
Summons - Notice
-
12-Sep-2011
Summons - Notice
-
27-Jul-2011
Summons - Notice
-
20-Jun-2011
Summons - Notice
-
02-May-2011
Summons - Notice
-
15-Mar-2011
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2007
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2009
Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the claimants' reference case seeking enhanced land compensation. The court held that claimants failed to establish through credible evidence that the Land Acquisition Officer's award was inadequate, finding their oral testimony unsubstantiated by documentary proof, proper comparables, or supporting land sale deeds. Since claimants did not discharge their initial burden of proving inadequacy, the burden did not shift to the state to justify the award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts