PRAVINBHAI DAYABHAI PARADVA vs GOVINDBHAI DEVDASBHAI HADIYA Advocate - C S SIROYA — 19/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 001. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ060000562015
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
19/2015
Filing Date
05-05-2015
Registration No
19/2015
Registration Date
05-05-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHORAJI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVINBHAI DAYABHAI PARADVA
Adv. K M PAREKH
SANGITABEN BHIKHABHAI SHYARA
Adv. K M PAREKH
CHANDULAL MAHADEVBHAI HIRPARA
Adv. K M PAREKH
BABUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI KOLADIYA
Adv. K M PAREKH
RASIKBHAI RAVJIBHAI PADALIYA
Adv. K M PAREKH
Respondent(s)
GOVINDBHAI DEVDASBHAI HADIYA Advocate - C S SIROYA
NITINBHAI RAMJIBHAI HADIYA
ASHWINBHAI RAMJIBHAI HADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 12-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-09-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-08-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' appeals (R.C.S. 19/2015). The Additional Civil Judge directed that new issues be framed regarding whether plaintiffs have the right to use a road as per a Gram Panchayat order, and whether defendants have obstructed the road in violation of the court's previous orders. The court also issued directions for proper consideration of settlement records, pleadings, and documentary evidence before final adjudication of the dispute over road usage rights between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' appeals (R.C.S. 19/2015). The Additional Civil Judge directed that new issues be framed regarding whether plaintiffs have the right to use a road as per a Gram Panchayat order, and whether defendants have obstructed the road in violation of the court's previous orders. The court also issued directions for proper consideration of settlement records, pleadings, and documentary evidence before final adjudication of the dispute over road usage rights between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts