Government of Gujarat vs Milanbhai Mukeshbhai Bhaskar Advocate - D M VAGHELA — 3082/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ050040362025

Filing Number

3082/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

3082/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213096250247

Police Station

JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Milanbhai Mukeshbhai Bhaskar Advocate - D M VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jetpur, acquitted the accused (Milanbhai Mukeshbhai Bhaskar) of charges under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence that he unlawfully possessed 10 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 2,000 on June 9, 2025. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the material evidence conclusively through proper documentation (FSL certificate), independent witness corroboration, and chain of custody procedures required under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3082/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jetpur, acquitted the accused (Milanbhai Mukeshbhai Bhaskar) of charges under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence that he unlawfully possessed 10 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 2,000 on June 9, 2025. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the material evidence conclusively through proper documentation (FSL certificate), independent witness corroboration, and chain of custody procedures required under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case