Government of Gujarat vs Kamlaben Batukbhai Valera Advocate - U A SONDARVA — 3079/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ050040332025
Filing Number
3079/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
3079/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JETPUR
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213096250169
Police Station
JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kamlaben Batukbhai Valera Advocate - U A SONDARVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 3079/2025, Jetpur Judicial Magistrate First Class Decision: The court acquitted the accused Kamlaben Butukbhai Valera of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution failed to establish that the seized liquor was in the accused's possession and lacked proper independent witness statements and FSL certification to conclusively prove the contraband's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3079/2025
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 3079/2025, Jetpur Judicial Magistrate First Class Decision: The court acquitted the accused Kamlaben Butukbhai Valera of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution failed to establish that the seized liquor was in the accused's possession and lacked proper independent witness statements and FSL certification to conclusively prove the contraband's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts