Government of Gujarat vs Chiragbhai Bhagvanjibhai Unaskar Advocate - J K VYAS — 3059/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66AA,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ050040112025
Filing Number
3059/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
3059/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JETPUR
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213022250432
Police Station
JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chiragbhai Bhagvanjibhai Unaskar Advocate - J K VYAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(a)(a) and 116(b), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that English liquor bottles (valued at ₹17,500) were in the defendant's direct possession. The court emphasized that the independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the case, the investigating officer provided no independent statements, and critical details like the seal authenticity on bottles remained unestablished, warranting acquittal under benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3059/2025
Summary The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(a)(a) and 116(b), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that English liquor bottles (valued at ₹17,500) were in the defendant's direct possession. The court emphasized that the independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the case, the investigating officer provided no independent statements, and critical details like the seal authenticity on bottles remained unestablished, warranting acquittal under benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts