Government of Gujarat vs Shaberaben Sumarbhai Juneja Advocate - D M VAGHELA — 2373/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ050030652025
Filing Number
2373/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
2373/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JETPUR
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213096250246
Police Station
JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaberaben Sumarbhai Juneja Advocate - D M VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary Case: C.C. No. 2373/2025 | Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65F, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charge of possessing 300 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹7,500. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the contraband was in the accused's possession, lacking proper FSL certification and independent witness corroboration. Order: Accused discharged; existing bail of ₹5,000 to continue until appeal period; confiscated materials to be destroyed post-appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2373/2025
Court Decision Summary Case: C.C. No. 2373/2025 | Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65F, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charge of possessing 300 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹7,500. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the contraband was in the accused's possession, lacking proper FSL certification and independent witness corroboration. Order: Accused discharged; existing bail of ₹5,000 to continue until appeal period; confiscated materials to be destroyed post-appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts