Government of Gujarat vs Sohilbhai Hanifbhai Solanki Advocate - D M VAGHELA — 1614/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ050020962025

Filing Number

1614/2025

Filing Date

21-Jul-2025

Registration No

1614/2025

Registration Date

21-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213096250128

Police Station

JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sohilbhai Hanifbhai Solanki Advocate - D M VAGHELA

  2. 2.Poojaben Lalitbhai Vegada

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted both accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 65(e) and 81 for allegedly selling illicit liquor to a minor, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked independent corroboration, key witnesses were hostile, and critical evidence regarding possession and seizure was inadequately established, thereby granting the accused the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 21-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1614/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted both accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 65(e) and 81 for allegedly selling illicit liquor to a minor, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked independent corroboration, key witnesses were hostile, and critical evidence regarding possession and seizure was inadequately established, thereby granting the accused the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case