Armanbhai Altafbhai Nai vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 173/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - JMFC

CNR: GJRJ050009452026

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213022260189

Police Station

JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Armanbhai Altafbhai Nai

    Adv. A S PATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS Act case (Sections 8(C) and 20-B(2-A)) involving 197 grams of narcotic substance. The court applied the principle "Bail is Rule and jail is an exception," noting that the offense carries a maximum punishment of one year imprisonment and considering the accused's local residence and lack of criminal history. Bail was approved on a bond of ₹20,000 with conditions including regular court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and provision of valid identification documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS Act case (Sections 8(C) and 20-B(2-A)) involving 197 grams of narcotic substance. The court applied the principle "Bail is Rule and jail is an exception," noting that the offense carries a maximum punishment of one year imprisonment and considering the accused's local residence and lack of criminal history. Bail was approved on a bond of ₹20,000 with conditions including regular court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and provision of valid identification documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case