Himalit Parshurambhai Limbani vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 172/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - JMFC

CNR: GJRJ050009442026

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213022260187

Police Station

JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Himalit Parshurambhai Limbani

    Adv. D M VAGHELA

  2. 2.Sagar Mansukhbhai Sagadhiya

    Adv. D M VAGHELA

  3. 3.Ankit Dineshbhai Solanki

    Adv. D M VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to all three accused in CRMA No.172/2026 under BNS sections 303(2) and 54, setting bail at Rs. 15,000 each with a surety of equal amount. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception," finding that the accused had no prior criminal history, were not flight risks, and considering their socio-economic circumstances, while imposing conditions including regular court attendance and a prohibition on intimidating witnesses or committing further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to all three accused in CRMA No.172/2026 under BNS sections 303(2) and 54, setting bail at Rs. 15,000 each with a surety of equal amount. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception," finding that the accused had no prior criminal history, were not flight risks, and considering their socio-economic circumstances, while imposing conditions including regular court attendance and a prohibition on intimidating witnesses or committing further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case