Rahulbhai Bodabhai Vakatar vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 171/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - JMFC

CNR: GJRJ050009432026

Filing Number

171/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

171/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213096250547

Police Station

JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahulbhai Bodabhai Vakatar

    Adv. Y G DOMADIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail application of accused Rahulbhai Bodabhai in a Prohibition Act case involving alleged possession of English liquor worth ₹61,04,280 and related items. The court held that prohibition offenses are serious crimes against society, and granting bail would send a negative message and encourage similar crimes; therefore, bail was deemed unjustifiable given the severity of the offense and strong prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of accused Rahulbhai Bodabhai in a Prohibition Act case involving alleged possession of English liquor worth ₹61,04,280 and related items. The court held that prohibition offenses are serious crimes against society, and granting bail would send a negative message and encourage similar crimes; therefore, bail was deemed unjustifiable given the severity of the offense and strong prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case