Government of Gujarat vs Rohitbhai Kishorbhai Suva Advocate - D M VAGHELA — 667/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ050009382026

Filing Number

667/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

667/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213022260104

Police Station

JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rohitbhai Kishorbhai Suva Advocate - D M VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused Rohitbhai Kishorbhai Suvia under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing liquor without a valid permit. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's poor financial condition, plea for rehabilitation, and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused Rohitbhai Kishorbhai Suvia under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing liquor without a valid permit. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's poor financial condition, plea for rehabilitation, and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case