Government of Gujarat vs Kinjalben Ajaybhai Vaddoriya Advocate - D M VAGHELA — 665/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ050009362026

Filing Number

665/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

665/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213096250481

Police Station

JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kinjalben Ajaybhai Vaddoriya Advocate - D M VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the defendant Kinjal Ben Ajay Bhai Wadisodiya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing country-made liquor. The court sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 200 with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering her impoverished circumstances and potential for reformation, while imposing a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 665/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jetpur Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the defendant Kinjal Ben Ajay Bhai Wadisodiya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing country-made liquor. The court sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 200 with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering her impoverished circumstances and potential for reformation, while imposing a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case