Priyankaben Mohitbhai Khuha vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 39/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJRJ050003252026

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Priyankaben Mohitbhai Khuha

    Adv. S A VORA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.State Bank Of India

  3. 3.IDFC First Bank

  4. 4.Punjab National Bank

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Sections 497 and 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering the release of seized funds totaling ₹14,047 (₹3,847 + ₹5,900 + ₹4,400) that were frozen in multiple bank accounts during a cyber fraud investigation. The court granted custody of the amount to the petitioner conditional upon furnishing a bond and security, finding no FIR was filed, no arrest made, and no other claimant came forward after considerable time had elapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    For Report Police Inquiry

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Sections 497 and 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering the release of seized funds totaling ₹14,047 (₹3,847 + ₹5,900 + ₹4,400) that were frozen in multiple bank accounts during a cyber fraud investigation. The court granted custody of the amount to the petitioner conditional upon furnishing a bond and security, finding no FIR was filed, no arrest made, and no other claimant came forward after considerable time had elapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case