Rajeshbhai Narshinhbhai Bhadeliya vs Shaileshkumar Gordhandas Bosmiya Advocate - R G BOSMIYA — 50/2015
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ050000612015
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
50/2015
Filing Date
23-03-2015
Registration No
50/2015
Registration Date
23-03-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, JETPUR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajeshbhai Narshinhbhai Bhadeliya
Adv. H H DESAI
Kamuben Narsinhbhai Bhadeliya
Adv. H H DESAI
Respondent(s)
Shaileshkumar Gordhandas Bosmiya Advocate - R G BOSMIYA
Ghanshyamkumar Gordhandas Bosmiya
Adv. R G BOSMIYA
Babulal Ravajibhai Donga
Adv. K N LAKHANI
Popatbhai Khodabhai
Adv. K N LAKHANI
Rajnikantbhai Ravajibhai Donga, Director, Rilayable Silika Desicate Pvt.Ltd
Adv. K N LAKHANI
Bhaveshbhai Babubhai Patel, Partner, Rajhans Bio Fuel
Adv. K N LAKHANI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The petition (Old Sp.C.S. No. 6 of 2010 / New RSC No. 50 of 2015) filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners seeking maintainability and relief regarding disputed agricultural land in Jaipur, Taluka, Gujarat, has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case as a first appearance case and lacked clear evidence of ownership rights over the disputed property. The interim relief applications (Annexures 5 and 33) were also rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The petition (Old Sp.C.S. No. 6 of 2010 / New RSC No. 50 of 2015) filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners seeking maintainability and relief regarding disputed agricultural land in Jaipur, Taluka, Gujarat, has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case as a first appearance case and lacked clear evidence of ownership rights over the disputed property. The interim relief applications (Annexures 5 and 33) were also rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts