ILABEN JYOTISHBHAI MADHAVJIBHAI SAVALIYA vs RAMESHBHAI SAVJIBHAI GINOYA — 720/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125,106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ040010882026
Filing Number
720/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
720/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GONDAL
Judge
3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213097250337
Police Station
SULTANPUR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ILABEN JYOTISHBHAI MADHAVJIBHAI SAVALIYA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESHBHAI SAVJIBHAI GINOYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted defendant Rameshbhai Savjibhai Ghinoya of charges under BNS 2023 sections 281, 125, 106(1) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding insufficient evidence to prove the rash or negligent driving allegation. Although the prosecution presented documentary evidence of a vehicle accident involving injuries, the court noted that the complainant's own testimony failed to corroborate the case narrative, witnesses were declared hostile, and the parties subsequently reached a settlement, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 720/2026
Summary The court acquitted defendant Rameshbhai Savjibhai Ghinoya of charges under BNS 2023 sections 281, 125, 106(1) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding insufficient evidence to prove the rash or negligent driving allegation. Although the prosecution presented documentary evidence of a vehicle accident involving injuries, the court noted that the complainant's own testimony failed to corroborate the case narrative, witnesses were declared hostile, and the parties subsequently reached a settlement, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts