ILABEN JYOTISHBHAI MADHAVJIBHAI SAVALIYA vs RAMESHBHAI SAVJIBHAI GINOYA — 720/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125,106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ040010882026

Case disposed

Filing Number

720/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

720/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213097250337

Police Station

SULTANPUR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,125,106(1)
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

ILABEN JYOTISHBHAI MADHAVJIBHAI SAVALIYA

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMESHBHAI SAVJIBHAI GINOYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

12-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted defendant Rameshbhai Savjibhai Ghinoya of charges under BNS 2023 sections 281, 125, 106(1) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding insufficient evidence to prove the rash or negligent driving allegation. Although the prosecution presented documentary evidence of a vehicle accident involving injuries, the court noted that the complainant's own testimony failed to corroborate the case narrative, witnesses were declared hostile, and the parties subsequently reached a settlement, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted defendant Rameshbhai Savjibhai Ghinoya of charges under BNS 2023 sections 281, 125, 106(1) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding insufficient evidence to prove the rash or negligent driving allegation. Although the prosecution presented documentary evidence of a vehicle accident involving injuries, the court noted that the complainant's own testimony failed to corroborate the case narrative, witnesses were declared hostile, and the parties subsequently reached a settlement, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case