CHANDUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI SAVALIYA vs K K PATEL GENERAL MARCHANT AND CAMSSION AGENT — 713/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ040009642025
Filing Number
713/2025
Filing Date
12-03-2025
Registration No
713/2025
Registration Date
12-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GONDAL
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI SAVALIYA
Adv. A K GORI
Respondent(s)
K K PATEL GENERAL MARCHANT AND CAMSSION AGENT
KABABHAI KHODIFAD
ANKITBHAI KABABHAI KHODIFAD
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 04-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gondal found the accused (Ankitbhai Kababhai Khodifad) guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored check worth Rs. 6,65,000 for onion sale transactions. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment, with an additional two months if he fails to compensate the complainant, after thoroughly analyzing evidence including bills, bank return memos, and witness testimony that established the commercial transaction and check dishonor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gondal found the accused (Ankitbhai Kababhai Khodifad) guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored check worth Rs. 6,65,000 for onion sale transactions. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment, with an additional two months if he fails to compensate the complainant, after thoroughly analyzing evidence including bills, bank return memos, and witness testimony that established the commercial transaction and check dishonor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts