GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs JITESHBHAI URFE JITYO BHIMABHAI SONALKI — 502/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ040008472026

Filing Number

502/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

502/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213015260042

Police Station

GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.

Respondent(s)

1.JITESHBHAI URFE JITYO BHIMABHAI SONALKI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court found the accused Jitesh Solankhi guilty of violating the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), and sentenced him to imprisonment until court closure plus a fine of Rs. 100, with 7 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied lenient sentencing considering the accused's circumstances, family responsibilities, and poverty, exercising discretion to impose punishment below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 502/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Jitesh Solankhi guilty of violating the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), and sentenced him to imprisonment until court closure plus a fine of Rs. 100, with 7 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied lenient sentencing considering the accused's circumstances, family responsibilities, and poverty, exercising discretion to impose punishment below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.