GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs DADBHAI RAMBHAI MAKAD — 501/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ040008462026

Filing Number

501/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

501/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213015260013

Police Station

GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DADBHAI RAMBHAI MAKAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Dadabhai Rambhai Makad guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or in default, 7 days simple imprisonment, considering his circumstances, first-time offense, family responsibilities, and impoverished status as mitigating factors for reducing the sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 501/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Dadabhai Rambhai Makad guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or in default, 7 days simple imprisonment, considering his circumstances, first-time offense, family responsibilities, and impoverished status as mitigating factors for reducing the sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case