GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs RAVIBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR — 339/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ040006702026
Filing Number
339/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
339/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GONDAL
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213015260034
Police Station
GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.
Respondent(s)
RAVIBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Judgment Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal, convicted accused Ravihai Babulai Parmar under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after the accused confessed to the charges. The court accepted the confession as true, voluntary, and legal. Considering the accused's circumstances (first-time offender, family responsibilities, poor economic condition), and citing precedent from Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 100 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid) instead of the prescribed punishment, with confiscation of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Judgment Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal, convicted accused Ravihai Babulai Parmar under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after the accused confessed to the charges. The court accepted the confession as true, voluntary, and legal. Considering the accused's circumstances (first-time offender, family responsibilities, poor economic condition), and citing precedent from Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 100 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid) instead of the prescribed punishment, with confiscation of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts