GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs RAVIBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR — 339/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ040006702026

Filing Number

339/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

339/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213015260034

Police Station

GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVIBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Judgment Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal, convicted accused Ravihai Babulai Parmar under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after the accused confessed to the charges. The court accepted the confession as true, voluntary, and legal. Considering the accused's circumstances (first-time offender, family responsibilities, poor economic condition), and citing precedent from Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 100 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid) instead of the prescribed punishment, with confiscation of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 339/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Judgment Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal, convicted accused Ravihai Babulai Parmar under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after the accused confessed to the charges. The court accepted the confession as true, voluntary, and legal. Considering the accused's circumstances (first-time offender, family responsibilities, poor economic condition), and citing precedent from Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 100 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid) instead of the prescribed punishment, with confiscation of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case