GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs ALPESHBHAI GOGANBHAI KOTHIYA — 338/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ040006692026

Case disposed

Filing Number

338/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213015260115

Police Station

GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.

Respondent(s)

ALPESHBHAI GOGANBHAI KOTHIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Gondal Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted accused Alpeshbhai Goganbbhai Kothiya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's circumstances—including that it was his first offense, his remorse, and his poor financial status with family responsibilities—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 7 days imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gondal Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted accused Alpeshbhai Goganbbhai Kothiya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's circumstances—including that it was his first offense, his remorse, and his poor financial status with family responsibilities—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 7 days imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case