GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs ALPESHBHAI GOGANBHAI KOTHIYA — 338/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ040006692026
Filing Number
338/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
338/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GONDAL
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213015260115
Police Station
GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.ALPESHBHAI GOGANBHAI KOTHIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Gondal Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted accused Alpeshbhai Goganbbhai Kothiya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's circumstances—including that it was his first offense, his remorse, and his poor financial status with family responsibilities—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 7 days imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 338/2026
Summary The Gondal Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted accused Alpeshbhai Goganbbhai Kothiya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's circumstances—including that it was his first offense, his remorse, and his poor financial status with family responsibilities—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 7 days imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts