GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs NILESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI BAVALIYA — 337/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ040006682026

Filing Number

337/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

337/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213015260125

Police Station

GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NILESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI BAVALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 337/2026, the Gondal Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Nileshbhai Dhirubhai Bavaliya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court sentenced him to 7 days imprisonment or a fine of Rs. 100, considering his circumstances—being a first-time offender with family responsibilities and poor economic status—and applied the principle that courts may impose lesser punishment than the statutory minimum when justified by individual case factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 337/2026, the Gondal Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Nileshbhai Dhirubhai Bavaliya under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court sentenced him to 7 days imprisonment or a fine of Rs. 100, considering his circumstances—being a first-time offender with family responsibilities and poor economic status—and applied the principle that courts may impose lesser punishment than the statutory minimum when justified by individual case factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case