PARESHBHAI HARIBHAI REVAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT CYBER — 179/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJRJ040005882026

Filing Number

179/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

179/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GONDAL

Judge

6-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARESHBHAI HARIBHAI REVAR

    Adv. R K DEGAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT CYBER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    CRMA NO. 179/2026 - Court Decision Summary The court ordered the refund of Rs. 20,000/- (frozen in Bank of Baroda account) to the applicant Rajkot police based on a cyber fraud complaint filed on 10/09/2025, wherein Rs. 35,000/- was illegally transferred from the applicant's IDFC First Bank account. The court found that the applicant was the best claimant to the frozen amount and directed its restoration to the applicant's IDFC bank account, subject to the condition that the applicant remain available before the magistrate court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Process To Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRMA NO. 179/2026 - Court Decision Summary The court ordered the refund of Rs. 20,000/- (frozen in Bank of Baroda account) to the applicant Rajkot police based on a cyber fraud complaint filed on 10/09/2025, wherein Rs. 35,000/- was illegally transferred from the applicant's IDFC First Bank account. The court found that the applicant was the best claimant to the frozen amount and directed its restoration to the applicant's IDFC bank account, subject to the condition that the applicant remain available before the magistrate court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case