P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI vs DEVJIBHAI VALJIBHAI CHAUHAN — 123/2025
Case under Gujarat Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030019652025
Filing Number
123/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
123/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI
Adv. M C DAVE
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVJIBHAI VALJIBHAI CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary In RCS No. 123/2025, a Gujarat civil court partially allowed the plaintiff (Western Gujarat Electricity Company Ltd.) suit against the defendant for recovery of unpaid electricity dues. The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 38,417/- (principal amount with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full payment) for electricity consumed from July-August 2023 to July-August 2024, along with case costs. The court rejected the defendant's claim of illegal meter tampering and unauthorized consumption based on the evidence and legal provisions under the Electricity Amendment Act 2003. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2025
Summary In RCS No. 123/2025, a Gujarat civil court partially allowed the plaintiff (Western Gujarat Electricity Company Ltd.) suit against the defendant for recovery of unpaid electricity dues. The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 38,417/- (principal amount with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full payment) for electricity consumed from July-August 2023 to July-August 2024, along with case costs. The court rejected the defendant's claim of illegal meter tampering and unauthorized consumption based on the evidence and legal provisions under the Electricity Amendment Act 2003. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts